Obervation- 9/11 Plane Crash (1st and 2nd)

I watched a video on www.youtube.com of the twin towers going down, I saw that it took some time before the other plane hit the tower. This observation stenthend my knowlage about 9/11 by it tellling me it took around 4 minutes for the second plane to hit the tower after the plane hit the first one. It also showed me what really happend and it wasnt some edited video that someone made. Also I didnt actually know that the fires were when the plane hit and after watching this video all what ive researched for the last couple months made sence. Like the fires made all the other floors colapes. I even noticed the other building had smoke comming out of it after the first plane hit, and before the second one hit the building. I noticed that the flames were just comming out if first tower and I noticed the second one had smoke comming out of it before the second plane hit it. I think the flames from the first building sort of caught on the tower that was not hit yet. thats what I noticed during my observation. One of the guys that was speaking said he watched the plane move slow and it lined itself up the hit the towers. Also when the second tower was hit I noticed that the plane hit the building on its side and didnt really line itself up to hit the tower also it was moving at a higher speed than the first tower that was hit. This is the URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmDKhw5rWuE&feature=related

Notes on Tracing deep, widespread roots of conspiracy beliefs

This artical was about the Shari'a, ayatollah, fatwa, jihad what they were saying and it has come to the English laungage that some of the things they said are alarming. Also they think the US goverment set up this attack for "war on terror." Also they think that it wasnt the work of the terroists.

Response on Tracing deep, widespread roots of conspiracy beliefs

The artical was basicly the best one I've probably ever found. It clearly stated that they think there needs to be a offical truth to this. Also they listed the more "reasonable" theories not ones that are completely out there like some news articals state. I think its just to get people talking and people need to let go of the past and focus on the present.

Notes on The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories

This artical was basicly a list that some person made up for 9.11 anmd how they think it came to be. They stated it was by controlled demilitions. Also they said that dibres wouldnt be flying out the windows if it wasnt a controlled demilion. And something about the top floors collapsing on eachother. It said that they are ignoring the several facts thats pretty much right infront of them. But clean up crew found no evidence of a controlled demilition.

Response to The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories

I think that not even half the therorys here are even true cause they seem to just been un relistic. And I think that they make up these things just to keep feeding the people what they want to hear. Also its just something to get out in the public so people can just talk about it.

Notes on The 9/11 Cover-Up

This artical was basicly about illnesses going around Manhattin New York. It started around when the towers had fallen but they dont have enough evedence to back it up. There has been skin & eye irritation going on. But maybe this may have never happend if the people did what they were supposed to do. Like clean up the inside of stuff, but they never really did & so they think thats what caused it but there is not enough evedence to back that statement up.

Response on The 9/11 Cover-Up

This artical mechions that they think theres health issue ever since the towers had fell. But there is no evidence that the towers have caused this issue. I think that they need to take the time and actually get to the bottom of things cause rumors & lies are going to keep spreading & its going to get everyone confused & more in a mess than we are now. From reading this artical, I think it just shows that the twin towers caused everything like the illnesses.

Al-Qaida No. 2 says 9/11 theory propagated by Iran

This magazine artical was about the Shiites blaming the 9/11 attack on Israel instead of Al-Qaida. There was a 2 hour voice recording on the Islamic Website and the voice sounded like the past auto tapes from the terror leader.

Response to Al-Qaida No. 2 says 9/11 theory propagated by Iran

I think it's sort of stupid too blame something on someone else on something that you did, like the attacks of 9/11. Al- Quida leaders are mad at the shiite Iranians because the Shiites are trying to blame 9/11 on Israel. Al-Quida is blaming Iran of trying to gain more power in the middle east.

Notes on 9/11 a THIRD Skyscraper

This artical was stating people are saying that there was a third tower that fell. Also it said that the commander didnt go to his comand center on the morning of September 11th. So therefore thats why they couldnt get defence. Also they said its easy for building 7 to get hit cause it was bigger than the twin towers but half the weight of the two towers. So basicly they were saying building 7 was an easy target.

Responce on 9/11 THIRD skyscaper

I think people need to come together and dicucss this cause they are saying there was a 3rd skyscraper that they hit. But later in the artical it said that no one actually saw the video or saw it fall. Well to me thats making everything worse cause its adding to what people are trying to unfold. I think you shouldnt say anything unless you know what happend to the towers cause you cant really think that randomly, thats how rumors start.

Notes on political suspections

People think that this would have never happend if it wasnt for the government effort. Which means the government needed to put in effort and get the plans in the air to get the hijackers out. Nothing was on for warnings so there was no way of knowing what was happening.

Responce on political suspicions

This artical states that the 9/11 conspericy is beingcomming untouched meaning that no one is really into it anymore and not researching it. They are comming concerned cause there is no news articals on this situation and theres so little of people that want to do this and theres no one that wants to do it.

Notes on why 9/11 conspiracy theories wont go away

There was alot of information in this artical, and I mean alot! It stated that they think that the impact of the plans were not the cause of the twin towers going down. They think its caused of controlled demolition. Also the dust from the top floor was from the force of collapsing on the other floors. Also time magazine said there was a hole that was punched in the wings which didnt make the impact as bad on the towers. The planes supposidly hit 5 lampposts on the way to the towers. They think a man named Hani Hanjour was at the controls on the plane, Also employees reported smelling cordite after the attack. But usually when planes go up in the air they have to go threw a check and this plane didnt go threw a check before it went airborn so its hard to tell if the wings really did have a hole in them.

Responce on why 9/11 conspiracy theories wont go away

This magazine artical states that they think the force of the plans didnt cause the twin towers to go down. I think thats not true cause I mean what else would have done it. Also I think they are getting alittle redictulous on trying to find out the truth about 9/11 cause the theories in the magazing artical are alittle out there and probably to most likely didnt happen. Maybe the truth isnt supposed to come out and we maybe live without ever knowing what really did happen. I would rather live that way than believe a complete lie that someone made up.

Notes on 9/11 cover up

This artical thinks the defence system didnt have any advance warning systems. Which basicly means that they airnt prepaired for anything. They think air defence would have taken care of this problem. They think plot was planed carefully. Right after the demenstrations for safty where gone over the terrorist where in action. But no one could call out on the phones cause they shut the lines off.

Responce on 9/11 cover up

This artical made me feel like they are putting 9/11 off and trying to forget about it. They think advance warnings were completely ignorned cause if they didnt ignore the warnings than they could have actaully done something about this, and maybe this would have never happend. But this artical encourages people to leave comments on what they think happend in 9/11. I feel they are actually trying to get to the bottom of this and leaving all doors open to suggestions and thoughts.

Notes on more than words alone

This artical was about the goverment saying that there is no verble communication. They said that they should get more theories behind 9/11 to actually start talking about it. Also journalists airnt plublishing anything about it. Also the news is not saying anything about it eaither. So basicly this artical was saying to come up with theories so the news and journalists can start talking about it more.

Response on more words alone

I Think that there isn't much being said about theories behind 9/11. I think the scientists know what is going on just they haven't put it out in the plublic to know. I think it seems sort of weird that there doing that, but it seems like they are hiding information they have found out, and not realeasing the new information.