06 February, 2009

Notes on 9/11 a THIRD Skyscraper

This artical was stating people are saying that there was a third tower that fell. Also it said that the commander didnt go to his comand center on the morning of September 11th. So therefore thats why they couldnt get defence. Also they said its easy for building 7 to get hit cause it was bigger than the twin towers but half the weight of the two towers. So basicly they were saying building 7 was an easy target.

Responce on 9/11 THIRD skyscaper

I think people need to come together and dicucss this cause they are saying there was a 3rd skyscraper that they hit. But later in the artical it said that no one actually saw the video or saw it fall. Well to me thats making everything worse cause its adding to what people are trying to unfold. I think you shouldnt say anything unless you know what happend to the towers cause you cant really think that randomly, thats how rumors start.

Notes on political suspections

People think that this would have never happend if it wasnt for the government effort. Which means the government needed to put in effort and get the plans in the air to get the hijackers out. Nothing was on for warnings so there was no way of knowing what was happening.

Responce on political suspicions

This artical states that the 9/11 conspericy is beingcomming untouched meaning that no one is really into it anymore and not researching it. They are comming concerned cause there is no news articals on this situation and theres so little of people that want to do this and theres no one that wants to do it.

31 January, 2009

Notes on why 9/11 conspiracy theories wont go away

There was alot of information in this artical, and I mean alot! It stated that they think that the impact of the plans were not the cause of the twin towers going down. They think its caused of controlled demolition. Also the dust from the top floor was from the force of collapsing on the other floors. Also time magazine said there was a hole that was punched in the wings which didnt make the impact as bad on the towers. The planes supposidly hit 5 lampposts on the way to the towers. They think a man named Hani Hanjour was at the controls on the plane, Also employees reported smelling cordite after the attack. But usually when planes go up in the air they have to go threw a check and this plane didnt go threw a check before it went airborn so its hard to tell if the wings really did have a hole in them.

Responce on why 9/11 conspiracy theories wont go away

This magazine artical states that they think the force of the plans didnt cause the twin towers to go down. I think thats not true cause I mean what else would have done it. Also I think they are getting alittle redictulous on trying to find out the truth about 9/11 cause the theories in the magazing artical are alittle out there and probably to most likely didnt happen. Maybe the truth isnt supposed to come out and we maybe live without ever knowing what really did happen. I would rather live that way than believe a complete lie that someone made up.

Notes on 9/11 cover up

This artical thinks the defence system didnt have any advance warning systems. Which basicly means that they airnt prepaired for anything. They think air defence would have taken care of this problem. They think plot was planed carefully. Right after the demenstrations for safty where gone over the terrorist where in action. But no one could call out on the phones cause they shut the lines off.

Responce on 9/11 cover up

This artical made me feel like they are putting 9/11 off and trying to forget about it. They think advance warnings were completely ignorned cause if they didnt ignore the warnings than they could have actaully done something about this, and maybe this would have never happend. But this artical encourages people to leave comments on what they think happend in 9/11. I feel they are actually trying to get to the bottom of this and leaving all doors open to suggestions and thoughts.

16 January, 2009

Notes on more than words alone

This artical was about the goverment saying that there is no verble communication. They said that they should get more theories behind 9/11 to actually start talking about it. Also journalists airnt plublishing anything about it. Also the news is not saying anything about it eaither. So basicly this artical was saying to come up with theories so the news and journalists can start talking about it more.

Response on more words alone

I Think that there isn't much being said about theories behind 9/11. I think the scientists know what is going on just they haven't put it out in the plublic to know. I think it seems sort of weird that there doing that, but it seems like they are hiding information they have found out, and not realeasing the new information.

23 December, 2008

Opal's

Paige i love the fact that you are so passionate about this.
But i think that you might need a little more information on this as well.
there was a few spelling mistake in your writing like "a alittle".
But it looks fine after that.
I am still interested in why you picked this topic.

DOOFY

You made a few spelling mistakes like "a alittle" from your top paragraph. But other than that it looks good.

Camerons Response

It looks like your very interested in your topic. Maybe get some more info but other than that everything looks good. This was a very interesting topic to research.

12 December, 2008

Notes on WTC (world trade center artical)

All together I think people need to sit down and discuss this, instead of getting all stories mixed up. I think no matter how important you are, I think EVERYONE needs to be apart of this problem, I think all together everyone should be researching a alittle bit and maybe we will come to an agreement. There are too many buildings involved in this, when the main point is the two twin towers. Like for example, building 7 got involved and it makes everything worse cause it off sets from the main focus.

Summery on 9/11 facts on the Sudden Implosion of WTC Building inconsistent with offical Muslim conspiracy scenario

This artical was about people recalling that there was a 3rd building that was hit on September 11th. They mechionthatthere is no way that building 7 could have possibly collapsed. Because of this conspiracy, people are saying that it was 300 ft. from the towers and it took up most of the city block. Also it was steal framed and had concreat. People are saying plans didnt even hit the building 7 nor did the dabris. They think it was from small fires within it.

18 November, 2008

Notes on: Bitish TV attempts to summarize cast for 9/11 truth.

I think people need to sit down and talk about this case more then anything. Instead of people making up all these theories that confuse other people including myslelf. I think they need to do a investigation type thing and get real answers and be sure of it. Because there are hundreds of theories out there like the plane didnt hit the towers etc. But most of all we need to get into this distaster more and take the time to find the real answers.

British TV attempts to summarize case for 9/11 truth.

The UK's Independent Television New had a short segment of a Monday broadcast explaining poles of the 9/11 truth. There is a theory that the impact of the planes or fire the fire was not the cause of 9/11. They pointed out what they think caused it and that was by contolled demolitions. Also another interesting threory is the planes that hit the World Trade Center had shaped charched warheads in their planes nose. People think that there is no way for a building so tall and a plane so small to have a impact like this. They think this because of the small impact hole. There are almost 150 million Web pages that are devoted to 911 theories. Some People say that the terrorists were going to the Penntigon to crash into that, but they never did. They went into the Twin Towers.

12 November, 2008

Matt's responce

I think the blog looked good and the text color matched the background nice.
I did not find any spelling mistakes and the picture looked good
Nothing looked bad to me in the blog overall.

Maceys Response

Paige, I think that its great that you want to learn more about what happened with the Twin Towers. It sounds very interesting. I think it could be kind of hard for you to get new information, because they dont really know exactly what happened and why they decided to attack the Twin Towers. Although I am sure you are going to find variations of information, because there is a lot of talk about what happened to the Twin Towers, but some of it might be false.

Victoria's Post

I think it is good that you are reserching this topic. There are a lot of people out there that don't think about 9/11 to much anymore. To find out direct information you could go to websites that are of newspapers in New York. Try the New York Times. They might have information.

You might want to do spell check again becasue I noticed one or two spelling mistakes. Other then that everything looks good.

Laura's Post

I like what topic you picked, but there are a few spelling errors. In 9/11 make sure you have the slash on all of them. Updated is also one word instead of two. It is good that you have a pretty good amount of information and there usually is a lot about it on television. I like the look of your blog it is easy to read. You could try and find someone that was in the twin towers when it happend and get their point of view, and their story on what happend to them.

07 November, 2008

I decided too do my topic on theorys of 911. I'm intersested in the theorys behind 911 because it seems so fasinating to me and I would like too learn more about it. Also learn differant theorys behind it, like were the plane crashed or why they wanted to fly into the twin towers.

As I was checking for up dated information, I found there was really current information from two days ago. I found lots on google but not too much on the data bases. I am sure I will have no problem finding up dated information on this topic because its on the TV all the time.

Lots of information was avalible to me on google and some on data bases. I researched it before this and it seemed to be current.

This topic has ongoing results because people are still researching it and they are posting what they have found out about it. So that information is avalible too me.

It will be some what challenging for me to find information because, there wasnt all that much information on data bases. But there were lots on google. I'm hoping to learn lots from this research and tell others about it. And find out more facts everyday.